Skip to main content
· 3/14/2002

MGM Supply Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State

Citations

  • 62 P.3d 1001
  • 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 342
  • 2002 WL 392461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing differences between litigants in “ordinary civil disputes” and litigants in workers’ compensation proceedings
  • “Whet her [the] burden of proof has been satisfied is a question of fact . . . .”
  • “Whether [the] b urden of proof has been satisfied is a question of fact . . . . ”
  • “Whet her [the] burden of proof has been satisfied is a question of fact . . . .”
  • “Whether [the] burden of proof has been satisfied is a question of fact . . . .”
  • ALJ must resolve ambiguities in DIME physician's report regarding whether claimant is at MMI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Marquez, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.