Skip to main content
· 6/25/2009

MGM Mirage v. Nevada Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Citations

  • 209 P.3d 766
  • 125 Nev. 223
  • 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 22
  • 2009 Nev. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that insurers traditionally undertake a duty to pay claims in exchange for the consideration of premium payments from the insured in construing an insurer's obligations on workers compensation claims
  • providing that this court \should give effect to [al statute's plain meaning\
  • “when the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, such that it is capable of only one meaning, this court should not construe that statute otherwise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons, Polaha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.