M'Gary v. President of Lafayette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he rule against introducing new facts on reply is not a new one in this 27 district or in the Ninth Circuit.”
• “[T]he rule against introducing new facts on reply is not a new one in this 27 district or in the Ninth Circuit.”
• “[T]his argument does not seek 22 reconsideration, it is a new argument that Emerald waived by not raising earlier.”
• “Evidence is not newly discovered if it could have been adduced during 23 pendency of the motion at issue.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).