Skip to main content
· 2/27/2012

MGA Insurance Co. v. Charles R. Chesnutt, P.C.

Citations

  • 358 S.W.3d 808
  • 2012 WL 50615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “party cannot rely on its own pleadings allegations as evidence of facts” in opposition to a motion for summary judgment
  • “Money had and received is a category of general assumpsit to restore money where equity and good conscience require refund.” (quoting MGA, 358 S.W.3d at 813
  • “To prove a claim for money had and received, a plaintiff must show that a defendant holds money which in equity and good conscience belongs to him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridges, Richter, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.