Mezey v. Fioramonti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• husband’s mistress was defendant in fraudulent-transfer action brought by wife seeking to avoid transfers from husband to mistress
• “A party may not create access to appellate review merely by filing a new trial motion from a non-appealable interlocutory order.”
• “Husband had no absolute right to manage or dispose of community property under A.R.S. § 25–214(C). A husband's statutory rights to act with respect to marital property remain subject to his fiduciary duty to his wife's interest in the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).