Meyers v. Kissner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erosion due to defendant’s maintenance of levies was continuing nuisance
• explaining that a prescriptive flood easement arises when the property at issue has been subject to adverse and uninterrupted flooding for a period of 20 or more years with the knowledge and acquiescence of the owners
• continuing private nuisance gave rise over and over again to causes of action, and limitations period merely specified the window in time for which monetary damages may be recovered prior to the filing of the complaint
• continuing private nuisance gave rise over and over again to causes of action, and limitations period merely specified the window in time for which monetary damages may be recovered prior to the filing of the complaint
• continuing private nuisance gave rise over and over again to causes of action, and limitations period merely specified the window in time for which monetary damages may be recovered prior to the filing of the complaint
• uninterrupted flooding of downstream landowner by upstream landowner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).