Skip to main content
· 7/15/1981

Meyers v. Interwest Corp.

Citations

  • 632 P.2d 879
  • 1981 Utah LEXIS 851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summons may be amended even after statute of limitations has expired, and the date of the amended summons relates back to the date of the initial summons
  • holding that summons may be amended even after statute of limitations has expired, and the date of the amended summons relates back to the date of the initial summons
  • noting that “amendments are allowed to complaints and process, even though the amendment relates back to the time of original filing and even though, but for the right to amend, the limitation period would have run”
  • “It is axiomatic that a court acquires power to adjudicate by proper service of process which imparts notice that the defendant is being sued.... In that manner a court acquires jurisdiction to enter a judgment against a party.”
  • “It is axiomatic that a court acquires power to adjudicate by proper service of process which imparts notice that the defendant is being sued and must appear and defend or suffer a default judgment.” (quotation simplified) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Howe, Oaks, Hall, Maughan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.