Skip to main content
· 10/23/1992

Meyers v. Hablutzel

Citations

  • 603 N.E.2d 91
  • 236 Ill. App. 3d 705
  • 177 Ill. Dec. 310
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that the insurer may join as a plaintiff, file an interpleader counterclaim, and participate in settlement negotiations
  • affirming application of common fund doctrine where the plaintiff filed suit before the insurer paid medical expenses and informed the plaintiff’s attorney of its subrogation rights and its decision not to hire the plaintiff’s attorney
  • affirming application of common fund doctrine where the plaintiff filed suit before the insurer paid medical expenses and informed the plaintiff's attorney of its subrogation rights and its decision not to hire the plaintiff's attorney
  • insurer-subrogee liable under the common fund doctrine where it was only after the insured filed suit that the insurer-subrogee gave notice that the insured’s attorney’s services were not desired
  • insurer-subrogee liable under the common fund doctrine where it was only after the insured filed suit that the insurer-subrogee gave notice that the insured's attorney's services were not desired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.