· 1/14/2010
Meyers v. Astrue
Citations
- 681 F. Supp. 2d 388
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2975
- 2010 WL 175160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “That [the plaintiff] engaged in work on a part-time basis does not support a finding [that] she had the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Arcara
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.