Skip to main content
· 1/14/2010

Meyers v. Astrue

Citations

  • 681 F. Supp. 2d 388
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2975
  • 2010 WL 175160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “That [the plaintiff] engaged in work on a part-time basis does not support a finding [that] she had the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard J. Arcara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.