Meyerheim v. Robertson
Citations
- 144 U.S. 601
- 12 S. Ct. 754
- 36 L. Ed. 559
- 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2106
Syllabus
<p>Laces made by machinery out of linen thread were imported in 1881 and 1882, and charged with duty at 40 per cent ad valorem, as “ manufactures of flax, or of which flax shall be the component material of chief value, not otherwise proyided for,” under Schedule C of § 2504 of the Revised Statutes (p. 462). The ■importei’s claimed that they were chargeable with a duty of only 30 per cent ad valorem, as “ thread lace,” under the same schedule (p. 463). Held, that, as the evidence clearly showed that tlie goods were' invariably bought and sold as “ torchons,” and not as thread laces, and that thread lace was always hand-made, it was proper to direct a verdict for the defendant, in a.suit brought by thé importer against the collector to recover an alleged excess of .duty.</p>
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.