Skip to main content
· 10/15/1858

Meyer v. Van Collem

Citations

  • 7 Abb. Pr. 222
  • 28 Barb. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the insurer was not estopped from denying coverage for loss sustained after the insured died because “the controlling fact” was that the insured had only a life estate, and thus the insurable interest had ended upon the insured’s death
  • holding that the insurer was not estopped from denying coverage for loss sustained after the insured died because \the controlling fact\ was that the insured had only a life estate, and thus the insurable interest had ended upon the insured's death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.