Skip to main content
· 11/15/2012

Meyer v. UST-United States Trustee (In Re Scholz)

Citations

  • 699 F.3d 1167
  • 2012 WL 5519600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the first factor favored appellate jurisdiction where “the bankruptcy court’s task on remand would have been primarily a computational one”
  • In calculating current monthly income, Congress “provided an express exclusion for … other sources of retirement income, such as Social Security benefits.”
  • Railroad Retirement Act benefits not excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan, Watford, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.