· 11/15/2012
Meyer v. UST-United States Trustee (In Re Scholz)
Citations
- 699 F.3d 1167
- 2012 WL 5519600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the first factor favored appellate jurisdiction where “the bankruptcy court’s task on remand would have been primarily a computational one”
- In calculating current monthly income, Congress “provided an express exclusion for … other sources of retirement income, such as Social Security benefits.”
- Railroad Retirement Act benefits not excluded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, Watford, Singleton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.