Skip to main content
· 10/25/2004

Meyer v. Union Railroad

Citations

  • 865 A.2d 857
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 407
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court should charge on a point of law when there is some factual support in the evidentiary record to support the charge
  • holding that a trial court should charge on a point of law when there is some factual support in the evidentiary record to support the charge
  • “The trial court indicated that it would deny the proposed point unless Union fashioned acceptable language. As Union failed to submit a revised point No. 19, the proposed point was not included in the trial court’s instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Lally-Green, Bowes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.