Meyer v. T-Mobile USA Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant’s failure to update an incorrect address for “4 1/2 years” constituted willful behavior
• holding there was more than a “mere failure to update the address listed” where the defendant ceased making payments to its registered agent and took no action to update its address for 4.5 years
• vacating an entry of default because although defendant willfully defaulted, defendant presented meritorious defenses and plaintiff would not be prejudiced
• vacating entry of default even while assuming one of the three factors weighed in favor of default
• interpreting “willfulness” in the context of a default to refer to conduct that is “more than merely negligent or careless”
• collecting cases in which vacatur was warranted in spite of willfulness of the default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).