Meyer v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• studying the constitutionality of a statute, reciting the competing interests, and finding the statute constitutional because, \The statute at issue balances these rights\
• studying the constitutionality of a statute, reciting the competing interests, and finding the statute constitutional because, \The statute at issue balances these rights\
• \[T]he plain language of [section 63-7-1660] indicates that a merits hearing must be scheduled to be held within thirty-five days of receipt of the removal petition. The statute does not indicate that the hearing must be completed within the thirty-five[-]day period.\
• reading section 20-7-610(M) in conjunction with section 20-7-736(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).