Meyer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court of appeals’ holdings that witness tampering statute was unconstitutional were not a “change in the law” coming from the United States Supreme Court or the Florida Supreme Court that could form the basis for post-conviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Delancy v. Tucker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-29· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Witt v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 342×
• State v. Bolyea
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 37×
• Finley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-23· cited 22×
• State v. Cohen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-15· cited 7×
• State v. Chapman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-04· cited 2×
• Lodson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-13· cited 1×
• Florida Bar v. Meyer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-08-18· cited 1×