Skip to main content
· 2/13/1884

Meyer v. Porter

Citations

  • 65 Cal. 67
  • 2 P. 884
  • 1884 Cal. LEXIS 443

Syllabus

<p>Municipal Charter—Repeal—Contracts.—The repeal of a municipal charter does not impair the validity of contracts made under its provisions.</p> <p>Treasurer—Payment of Interest—Mandamus.—Where the provisions of a municipal charter make it the duty of the treasurer to pay the interest of certain bonds when the same falls due out of a fund provided for that purpose, such payment is a duty specially enjoined by law upon the officer, and may be enforced by mandamus.</p> <p>Id.—Interest Coupons—Presentation for Audit and Allowance—Defense. —It is no defense to a proceeding for mandamus brought by an individual bondholder that the interest coupons had not been presented to the board of trustees for examination and audit, nor that there are other bond-holders interested in the fund who have not demanded payment.</p> <p>Statute of Limitations. — Such interest coupons are not barred by the Statute of Limitations until the bonds to which they belong are barred.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s belief that victim was reaching for weapon during confrontation did not constitute evidence of passion or provocation necessary to support voluntary manslaughter charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.