Skip to main content
· 3/26/1906

Meyer v. Meyer Bros.

Citations

  • 116 La. 456
  • 40 So. 794
  • 1906 La. LEXIS 515

Syllabus

<p>1. Partnership—Receiver—Appointment.</p> <p>Whether a receiver should be appointed gave rise to the issues involved.</p> <p>2. Same—Application.</p> <p>Under the district court’s discretion, directing plaintiffs to elect as to which of two demands plaintiffs would proceed with, they elected to prosecute the suit for the appointment of a receiver.</p> <p>3. Same—Prosperous and Extensive Business.</p> <p>The business of the parties which plaintiffs ask to place in the hands of a receiver, and which the defendants oppose, is prosperous and large.</p> <p>4. Same—Grounds.</p> <p>The charges made by plaintiffs are not sufficiently borne out by the facts to justify a judgment authorizing the appointment of a receiver.</p> <p>5. Same—Necessity.</p> <p>The necessity for the appointment is not apparent. The rights of parties are not threatened with loss.</p> <p>6. Same—Accounting.</p> <p>The right is reserved to plaintiffs to sue for a settlement and accounting.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding expert’s opinion after she admitted she was not familiar with information necessary to render her opinion
  • “Whether the architectural features of Defendants’ stationhouses comply with the relevant ADA accessibility standards is . . . one not entirely resolvable by lay persons.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.