Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/30/1995

Meyer v. Marilyn Miglin, Inc.

Citations

652 N.E.2d 1233
273 Ill. App. 3d 882
210 Ill. Dec. 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[i]f the contract terms are unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be ascertained exclusively from the express language of the contract, as a matter of law”
stating “[i]f the contract terms are unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be ascertained exclusively from the express language of the contract, as a matter of law”
disagreement between parties regarding how to interpret the terms of a contract does not in itself render the contract ambiguous
disagreement between parties regarding how to interpret the terms of a contract does not in itself render the contract ambiguous
“[W]hen a time for performance [of a contract] is not specified, a reasonable time will be implied.”
though “inartfully drafted,” agreement contained essential terms and was sufficiently concrete to be enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scariano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.