Meyer v. Marilyn Miglin, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f the contract terms are unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be ascertained exclusively from the express language of the contract, as a matter of law”
• stating “[i]f the contract terms are unambiguous, the parties’ intent must be ascertained exclusively from the express language of the contract, as a matter of law”
• disagreement between parties regarding how to interpret the terms of a contract does not in itself render the contract ambiguous
• disagreement between parties regarding how to interpret the terms of a contract does not in itself render the contract ambiguous
• “[W]hen a time for performance [of a contract] is not specified, a reasonable time will be implied.”
• though “inartfully drafted,” agreement contained essential terms and was sufficiently concrete to be enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).