Meyer v. Lucas
Citations
- 249 N.E.3d 851
- 2024 Ohio 3035
Syllabus
The trial court's judgment awarded appellee one-half of the increase in value of the house of appellant, her ex-fiancé, on her claim of unjust enrichment. The trial court's judgment was not against the manifest weight of the evidence appellee contributed to mortgage payments, household expenses, and the substantial improvements to the house while the parties were engaged to be married. The trial court's refusal to enter judgment in favor of appellant on his conversion claim also was not against the manifest weight of the evidence appellant failed to establish the value of his personal property at the time it was allegedly converted. Judgment affirmed. (Tucker, J., dissenting.)
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.