Meyer v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a motion styled as a directed verdict in non-jury action was a motion for non-suit under Rule 41(b), SCRCP, and therefore reviewing as such
• construing defendant’s “directed verdict” motion in a non-jury action as a motion for involuntary non-suit under Rule 41(b), SCRCP, and reviewing it as such
• stating that in an action at law for interpretation of a contract referred to the master-in-equity for final judgment, the appellate court will correct any error of law, but must affirm the master’s findings unless no evidence reasonably supports them
• construing defendant's \directed verdict\ motion in a non-jury action as a motion for involuntary non-suit under Rule 41(b), SCRCP, and reviewing it as such
• construing defendant's \directed verdict\ motion in a non-jury action as a motion for involuntary non-suit under Rule 41(b), SCRCP, and reviewing it as such
• noting Rule 50, SCRCP \by its nature is applicable to jury trials” and \the proper motion for [the appellant] to have made was a motion for involuntary non-suit under Rule 41, SCRCP”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).