Meyer v. IBP, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the remedy for failure to' consider all evidence “is to remand the case for a decision by the commissioner on the existing record”
• stating the agency’s application of law to the facts can be affected by an “erroneous interpretation of law”
• explaining concept of proximate or legal cause from tort law is misplaced in deciding “work-connectedness” for compensation law
• stating the remedy for failure to consider all evidence “is to remand the case for a decision by the commissioner on the existing record”
• providing a claimant in a workers’ compensation proceeding needs to establish (1) an employer-employee relationship at the time of the injury, (2) an injury arising out of and in the course of employment, and (3) the injury proximately caused the employee’s disability
• “We have said that the commissioner commits error by failing to weigh and consider all of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).