Meyer v. Fowler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee’s claims for breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and intentional infliction of emotional distress were preempted by section 301
• emotional distress claim arising out of application of attendance policy pre-empted because “determination of both the scope of Alumax’s control over the attendance policy and any consequences flowing from a violation of the policy are dependent upon an analysis of the [CBA]”
• employee must bring claim under § 301 within six months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).