Skip to main content
· 3/31/1906

Meyer-Clarke-Rowe Mines Co. v. Steinfeld

Citations

  • 10 Ariz. 194
  • 85 P. 1067
  • 1906 Ariz. LEXIS 120

Syllabus

<p>1. Mines and Mining — Claims—Boundaries—Conflict—Evidence— Bindings. — In an action to settle an alleged conflict in the boundaries of two mining claims, a finding that a point 300 feet north, 9 degrees west from the east end center of one of the claims, where the old northeast corner monument stood, was at the point now-marking the southeast corner of the conflicting claim according to-the survey for the patent. Held to be inconsistent, self-contradictory,, mathematically impossible, and unsupported by the evidence.</p>

Judges: Campbell, Doan, Kent, Naye, Sloan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.