Skip to main content
· 10/6/1930

Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Dollar S. S. Line

Citations

  • 44 F.2d 57
  • 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prisoner is not entitled “to demand specific care” or “to the best care possible” but only “to reasonable measures to meet a substantial risk of serious harm”
  • explaining that inmates are not entitled to demand either specific care or the best care possible
  • explaining that inmates are not entitled to “demand specific care” or “the best care possible”
  • explaining that inmates are neither “entitled to demand specific care [nor] entitled to the best care possible”
  • contrasting a reasonable response with a plaintiff’s preferred response, in the context of an Eighth Amend- ment claim
  • \Forbes is seeking a specific treatment and foolproof protection from infection. The Eight Amendment does not provide her with either.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Galston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.