· 10/6/1930
Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Dollar S. S. Line
Citations
- 44 F.2d 57
- 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prisoner is not entitled “to demand specific care” or “to the best care possible” but only “to reasonable measures to meet a substantial risk of serious harm”
- explaining that inmates are not entitled to demand either specific care or the best care possible
- explaining that inmates are not entitled to “demand specific care” or “the best care possible”
- explaining that inmates are neither “entitled to demand specific care [nor] entitled to the best care possible”
- contrasting a reasonable response with a plaintiff’s preferred response, in the context of an Eighth Amend- ment claim
- \Forbes is seeking a specific treatment and foolproof protection from infection. The Eight Amendment does not provide her with either.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Galston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.