Mey v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] motion under Rule 59(e) is not appropriate for presenting new legal arguments, factual contentions, or claims that could have previously been argued”
• affirming that appellant could not use Rule 59(e
• “A motion under Rule 59(e) is not appropriate for presenting new legal arguments, factual contentions, or claims that could have previously been argued”
• “A motion under Rule 59(e) is not appropriate for presenting new legal arguments, factual contentions, or claims that could have previously been argued.”
• discussing proper analysis of Rule 59(e) and 60(b) motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).