Skip to main content
· 9/15/1822

Meuillon v. Overton

Citations

  • 10 Mart. 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pure issue of law is preserved by motion for summary judgment and is reviewable after final judgment
  • noting that under Rule 8-131(a), “the issue of the jurisdiction of the trial court over a person may be reviewed as long as the party asserting a lack of jurisdiction has not waived this defense.”
  • stating that “to the extent that the issue of personal jurisdiction [was] a question of law, it is not properly submitted to the trier of fact to resolve,” and, therefore, there was “nothing to preclude our review of this issue”
  • stating that “to the extent that the issue of personal jurisdiction [was] a question of law, it is not properly submitted to the trier of fact to resolve,” and, therefore, there was “nothing to preclude our review of this issue”
  • claim for medical malpractice arises out of solicitation in Maryland by Pennsylvania hospital
  • \[A] holding that a forum may exert general jurisdiction over a party involves a legal finding that the defendant maintains continuous and systematic contacts with the forum which constitute doing business in the forum.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.