Metzger v. Spector Motor Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “whatever goods or services the place provides, it cannot discriminate on the basis of disability in providing enjoyment of those goods and services”
• holding that conditions on long-term disability benefits for mental illnesses did not constitute discrimination under the ADA, as conditions were equally applicable to all employees
• holding that a totally disabled former employee is not a “qualified individual” under the plain meaning of the ADA and hence cannot state a claim under the statute
• holding that the ADA covers “actual, physical places where goods or services 28 are open to the public, and places where the public gets those goods or services”
• holding that the ADA covers “actual, physical places where goods or services are open to the public, 26 || and places where the public gets those goods or services”
• holding that the ADA covers “actual, physical places where goods or services are open to the public, 26 || and places where the public gets those goods or services”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).