Metz v. US Life Ins. Co. in City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that judges in both California and 5 New York were fully capable of applying New York substantive law
• finding 8 that courts in both California and New York were fully capable of applying New York 9 substantive law
• indicating judges in both New York and California are fully capable of 14 deciding issues arising under both California and New York law
• finding 8 that courts in both California and New York were fully capable of applying New York 9 substantive law
• judges in both New York and California are fully capable of deciding issues 19 arising under both California and New York law
• judges in both New York and California are fully capable of deciding issues 19 arising under both California and New York law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).