· 9/13/2006
Metz v. Soares
Citations
- 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 743
- 142 Cal. App. 4th 1250
- 6 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8692
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12362
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1385
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If plaintiff had not used the [classic] car for a long time before he brought it to defendant, as the evidence showed, then he could not establish that defendant’s conduct proximately caused the particular detriment—loss of use—for which he sought damages.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sims, Scotland, Nicholson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.