Skip to main content
· 2/3/1994

Metz v. Department of Fire

Citations

  • 201 A.D.2d 760
  • 607 N.Y.S.2d 189
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no reason to apply the ABC test categorically to every working relationship, particularly when Borello appears to remain the standard for worker’s compensation . . . . Borello furnishes the proper standard as to [the plaintiff’s] non-wage-order claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.