Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hanover Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that district courts do “not review medical opinions independently but rather review the ALJ’s weighing of those opinions for substantial evidence”
• explaining that ALJ’s must consider the claimant’s subjective account of their symptoms in light of, among other things, “relevant medical evidence”
• stating that an ALJ must only “summarize the findings of a non-treating source’s opinion and note that those find- ings are not corroborated by objective evidence in the record”
• stating that an ALJ must only “summarize the findings of a non-treating source’s opinion and note that those find- ings are not corroborated by objective evidence in the record”
• stating that an ALJ must only “summarize the findings of a non-treating source’s opinion and note that those find- ings are not corroborated by objective evidence in the record”
• explaining that, “[a]s long as an ALJ gives specific reasons supported by the record,” the court will not overturn the ALJ’s assessment of the claimant’s subjective complaints “unless it is patently wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).