Metropolitan Rubber Co. v. Monarch Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding juveniles are not constitutionally entitled to a jury trial in adjudication proceedings under the United States Constitution (citing McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528, 530-57 (1971))
• explaining the \important distinctions\ between the family court juvenile adjudication process and the traditional criminal justice process and holding that neither the federal nor the state constitution entitles juveniles to a jury trial in family court adjudication proceedings
• \The party challenging the constitutionality of the statute has the burden of proving the statute unconstitutional.\ (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing the doctrine of parens patriae and the Children’s Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).