Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implied permission considered from perspective of subsequent permittee and exists as long as permittee does not know named insured prohibited third party use
• subsequent permittee had implied permission to use insured vehicle because no suggestion from evidence that he knew he was prohibited from using vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).