Metropolitan Mortgage Co. v. Metro-Mortgage Loan Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant presented , a substantial question where trial court extended sentence to statutory maximum and defendant suggested deviation from sentencing norms
• recognizing that “the [PBPP] has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years”
• holding that a claim that the trial court failed to offer specific reasons for imposing the maximum allowable sentence is a substantial question permitting appellate review
• concluding that the defendant raised a substantial question in claiming that the trial court focused on the seriousness of the offense and failed to consider the defendant’s rehabilitative needs
• recognizing that a claim that impugns the trial court’s failure to offer specific reasons for the sentence, which “comport with the considerations required in section 9721(b)[,]” raises a substantial question
• recognizing that a claim that impugns the trial court's failure to offer specific reasons for the sentence, which “comport with the considerations required in section 9721(b)[,]” raises a substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).