Metropolitan Life Insurance v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing prior supreme court statements as \dicta or holding\
• “ ‘When a court of last resort intentionally takes up, discusses, and decides a question germane to, though not necessarily decisive of, the controversy, such decision 9 Amendment principles is de novo. People v Hammerlund, 504 Mich 442, 451; 939 NW2d 129 (2019
• discussing exceptions from traditional notions of dictum
• court of appeals must follow supreme court decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).