Skip to main content
· 9/13/1983

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McShan

Citations

  • 577 F. Supp. 165
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \In both Wissner and Ridgway the existence of an anti-attachment provision was an independent basis upon which the Supreme Court found preemption.\
  • mere fact that FEGLI contains no attachment provision under which policy proceeds are protected from attachment, levy or seizure does not compel conclusion that a constructive trust may be imposed
  • FEGLI Act preempted state court divorce decree requiring insured to maintain children as beneficiaries
  • “federal regulations have no less preemptive effect than federal statutes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peckham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.