Skip to main content
· 3/7/2002

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Tracy Bigelow

Citations

  • 283 F.3d 436
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1941
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a DRO could be qualified when it clearly specified each plan to which it applied by identifying the plan as the “General Electric insurance plan which consists of group life insurance, disability death and insurance”
  • “[T]he issuances of [a] life insurance policy to fund the benefits under an ERISA plan confers federal question jurisdiction as to the appropriate distribution of its proceeds.”
  • “The Committee intends that an order will not be treated as failing to be a qualified order merely because the order does not specify the current mailing address of the participant and alternate payee if the plan administrator has reason to know that address independently of the order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.