Metropolitan Dade County v. RESOURCES RECOVERY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where an agreement and arbitration provision are admitted, but allegedly not in effect because of subsequent circumstances, issue is for arbitrators
• if the party is asserting that an existing arbitration clause is not in effect due to events following the contract, the issue of whether a question is arbitrable is for the arbitrators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. City of Miami
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-20· cited 25×
• Thomas W. Ward & Assoc., Inc. v. Spinks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-28· cited 13×
• Langner v. Charles A. Binger, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-17· cited 12×
• Feather Sound Country Club, Inc. v. Barber
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-17· cited 5×
• Florida Education Ass'n/United v. Sachs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-07· cited 1×
• Mirson v. Corradino Group, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-09· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-29· cited 36×
• POST TENSIONED ENG'G. CORP. v. Fairways Plaza Assoc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-09· cited 35×
• Hoffman v. Terry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-05· cited 29×
• Quayside Assoc v. Harbour Club Villas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-24· cited 20×
• Gersh v. Concept House, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-27· cited 12×
• In re the Arbitration between Brandt & Lawson Associates, Inc.
  New York Supreme Court· 1960-02-25· cited 2×