Metropolitan Dade County v. Reineng Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court held that the state health officer's factual determination that service area did not meet minimum population required by state health plan did not turn upon undisclosed information and unpromulgated criteria, but instead was supported by substantial evidence in the record
• Court held that the state health officer's factual determination that service area did not meet minimum population required by state health plan did not turn upon undisclosed information and unpromulgated criteria, but instead was supported by substantial evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).