Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that a decision met the “in writing” requirement when it summarized the facts of the dispute, recounted the proceedings, articulated the reasons for rejecting an application and explained the evidentiary basis for the ruling
• affirming that a decision met the “in writing” requirement when it summarized the facts of the dispute, recounted the proceedings, articulated the reasons for rejecting 22 No. 07-3949 an application and explained the evidentiary basis for the ruling
• adopting least intrusive means test after our decision in Albemarle T-MOBILE NORTHEAST v. FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD 11 County
• finding substantial evidence supporting a decision despite a lack of thoroughness or rigor on a particular issue
• calling the significant-gap test an “extremely fact-specific” inquiry that “deifies] any bright-line legal rule”
• \the TCA does not guarantee wireless service providers coverage free of small `dead spots'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).