Metromedia, Inc. v. Tax Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To meet the common-law definition of a fixture, the personalty in question must: (1) be actually annexed to real property or something appurtenant thereto; (2
• “To meet the common-law definition of a fixture, the 1 personalty in question must: (1) be actually annexed to real propérty or something appurtenant thereto; (2
• “Although the parties’ labeling of one as owner is not enough to create a taxable interest, a finding of such an interest is justified where that party exercises dominion and control over the property.”
• “To meet the common-law definition of a fixture, the personalty in question must: (1) be actually annexed to real property or something appurtenant thereto; (2) be applied to the use or purpose to which that part of the realty with which it is connected is appropriated; and (3
• “To meet the common-law definition of a fixture, the 1 personalty in question must: (1) be actually annexed to real propérty or something appurtenant thereto; (2) be applied to the use or purpose to which that part of the realty with which it is connected is appropriated; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).