Metro Traffic Control, Inc. v. Shadow Network Inc., and Citi Traffic Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Board finding that confusion was “so likely that it is virtually inevitable, ~ 22 ~ Cancellation No. 92064976 because the parties are using the identical mark for the identical services”
• “[C]onfusion was ‘so likely that it [wa]s virtually inevita- ble, because the parties [we]re using the identical mark for the identical services.’”
• “[C]onfusion was ‘so likely that it [wa]s virtually inevitable, because the parties [we]re using the identical mark [SHADOW TRAFFIC] for the identical services [traffic reporting].’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).