Skip to main content
· 7/25/1995

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.

Citations

  • 36 Cal. App. 4th 1832
  • 43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 327
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 9940
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5852
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disqualification is appropriate where counsel’s employment is adverse to the client or former client, even though the prior client is not a party to the litigation
  • “Where the duty of loyalty applies, it requires a per se, or automatic disqualification, in all but a few instances.”
  • “Where the duty of loyalty applies, it requires a per se, or automatic disqualification, in all but a few instances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.