Skip to main content
· 2/12/1985

Metro. Dade Cy. v. Bouterse, Perez & Fabregas

Citations

  • 463 So. 2d 526
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Awarding prejudgment interest from a time prior to the date any payment became due provides [the nonbreaching party] with a windfall and unjustly penalizes the [breaching party].”
  • breach of contract for progress payments, prejudgment interest calculated from date each payment due
  • where a party breached a contract calling for progress payments over a period of time, finding that prejudgment interest should be calculated on each progress payment from the date it would have become due
  • where a party breached a contract calling for progress payments over a period of time, finding that prejudgment interest should be calculated on each progress payment from the date it would have become due

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull, Nesbitt and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.