Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Community Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim of tortious interference with business relationships survived a motion for summary judgment when the defendants were “not in any way privy” to the business relationship at issue
• once Supreme Court’s jurisdiction is invoked, it may consider appeals and cross-appeals of other rulings in the case
• Because “[i]t is incumbent upon this Court, even when not raised by the parties, to inquire into its own jurisdiction,” this Court dismissed one of several related appeals on mootness grounds.
• borrowers’ lawsuit alleging wrongful foreclosure was allowed to proceed even though borrowers did not tender payment, where sale of promissory notes constituted tortious interference that harmed borrowers’ ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).