Methodist Hospital of Sacramento v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that APA was supplanted by statute that stated “[t]he Secretary shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice of the interim final DRG prospective payment rates” (emphasis added)
• holding that when the Department used the most reliable data available at the time, it was not required to recalculate reimbursements based on subsequently corrected data
• holding that when the Department used the most reliable data available at the time, it was not required to recalculate reimbursements based on subsequently corrected data
• explaining that a prospective payment system is a regime that \relies on prospectively fixed rates for each category of treatment rendered\
• observing that denial of retrospective relief encouraged providers to submit carefully prepared data in the first instance, knowing that a subsequent correction would have only prospective effect
• explaining that a prospective payment system is a regime that “relies on prospectively fixed rates for each 16 category of treatment rendered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).