Skip to main content
· 1/15/1912

Metcalfe v. Sackman

Citations

  • 66 Wash. 580
  • 120 P. 84
  • 1912 Wash. LEXIS 810

Syllabus

<p>Trusts — Resulting Trust — Evidence—Sufficiency. A resulting trust in lands will not be declared where the evidence is not clear, certain and conclusive and so cogent as to leave no reasonable doubt, especially where nearly fifty years elapsed since the transaction occurred.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error. On a trial de novo, error in the exclusion of a deposition which is brought up on appeal is harmless.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.