Skip to main content
· 9/2/2009

Mestral v. State

Citations

  • 16 So. 3d 1015
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12824
  • 2009 WL 2762684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a protective sweep of the defendant’s home was impermissible where no exigent circumstances existed
  • protective sweep was impermissible where “the officers entered the residence as part of a routine practice and not on the basis of any articulable facts which would warrant a reasonable belief that there was any dangerous individual inside who posed a threat to those on the arrest scene.”
  • \In this case the officers entered the residence as part of a routine practice and not on the basis of any articulable facts which would warrant a reasonable belief that there was any dangerous individual inside who posed a threat to those on the arrest scene.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, C.J., and Cope and Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.