Skip to main content
· 11/30/2001

Messino v. McBride

Citations

  • 174 F. Supp. 2d 397
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20064
  • 2001 WL 1563609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining “a plaintiff must have exhausted administrative remedies prior to filing suit, or the case is subject to dismissal”’
  • “In a case brought pursuant to the [FTCA], the proper defendant is the United States, and not the individual employee.”
  • “In a case brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., the proper defendant is the United States, and not the individual employee.”
  • “a plaintiff must have exhausted administrative remedies prior to filing suit” under the FTCA and “[c]ompletion of administrative proceedings after filing does not cure the defect, even if no substantive proceedings have yet taken place.”
  • “[c]ompletion of administrative proceedings after filing does not cure the defect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chasanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.