· 11/30/2001
Messino v. McBride
Citations
- 174 F. Supp. 2d 397
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20064
- 2001 WL 1563609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining “a plaintiff must have exhausted administrative remedies prior to filing suit, or the case is subject to dismissal”’
- “In a case brought pursuant to the [FTCA], the proper defendant is the United States, and not the individual employee.”
- “In a case brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., the proper defendant is the United States, and not the individual employee.”
- “a plaintiff must have exhausted administrative remedies prior to filing suit” under the FTCA and “[c]ompletion of administrative proceedings after filing does not cure the defect, even if no substantive proceedings have yet taken place.”
- “[c]ompletion of administrative proceedings after filing does not cure the defect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.